Monday, August 29, 2005
follow this link: http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=21791918
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Imagine that you had a little brother who was constantly getting beaten up by a neighborhood bully. You would step in and defend your brother on a regular basis and beat up, but not kill, the neighborhood bully. Each time you help your brother, you get hit a few times, but you always end up hurting the bully badly. Eventually, you tire of helping your brother and demand that he starts lifting weights, taking martial arts classes, etc., to beat up the bully himself. You hope that he will be ready soon, because you're sick of getting punched by the bully yourself.
To motivate your brother, you state publicly that he has two months to get ready and then he'll have to fight the bully himself. Interestingly, the bully stops attacking your brother quite so often during these months, so you declare victory early. However, when the two months have passed--and you leave--the bully returns. Unfortunately, your brother wasn't ready after all, and the bully not only beats your brother up; he kills him. Now you'd like to help, but its too late for both political and strategic reasons.
Now imagine that you never provided a "timeline" and kept the bully guessing. He would never know what your intentions were, which would strike at his morale and prevent him from planning a large-scale attack against a weakened enemy in the future. Unfortunately, the Democrats are so stupid that even this simple metaphor is too difficult to understand. Their ignorance is especially offensive because they are the ones who insist on "Vietnamizing" this war. You would think that they would have learned something from that conflict. Unfortunately, they were too stoned. For more, read this post.
Democrats are incapable of handling foreign policy. Never vote for them.
Likewise, when supply increases through increased production--for example, with oil drilling in the "prestine" Anwar preserve--prices are generally lower. In the same vein, success in Iraq would likely mean lower prices, as the Iraqis operating in their best interest would like to be like Kuwaitis: Rich.
In the long run, increased supply and decreased demand are both good for the country, and allow us a measure of economic independence. On the conservative side, we seek to increase production and use oil somewhat more efficiently than we have in the past. On the liberal side, they whine and complain about how oil companies are preventing the potato-powered car from coming on the market and about how Dick Cheney is teaming up with his oil buddies for, uhh, cheaper oil, blah, blah, blah.
Don't be surprised if the liberals blame Bush for the hurricane and create a conspiracy involving oil out of Katrina's arrival. It wouldn't be much stupider than their theories about war, oil production, and a host of other issues.
Maybe when the "U.S. authorities" are done "taking action" against Pat Robertson for daring to say that we should assassinate a Communist dicator (of all people), the same authorities can begin taking action against other agitators of violence, such as Al Sharpton or the Black Uhuru movement. I'm sure that the good Reverend will be right there to condemn their calls for violence as well, even though he has never been there in the past.
Come to think of it, if Reagan had only just resorted to "diplomacy" with the Soviet Union, like FDR did in Yalta, maybe it wouldn't have ever collapsed. I'm sure the good Reverend would agree that we should avoid tragedies like that in the future.
Friday, August 26, 2005
The "legitimate" media are calling this a hoax. But it is no more of a hoax than the Bill Burkett story, which so many of them wanted to believe, despite the evidence. If they repeat themselves often enough, maybe they'll believe this story too.
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Check this out to see how this Communist credo works out in practice. Gee, maybe Pat Robertson was right! Not that our Communist-minded liberal media would ever see the blatantly obvious failings of the political ideology they propagandize about in their reporting on a day-to-day basis.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Well golly gee. Maybe if they used these techniques on the f-ing MEXICAN BORDER we wouldn't have a problem with illegal immigrants/terrorists coming into the country!
Monday, August 22, 2005
Click here to see what your liberal heroes are up to this week!!! Da da da, you trade your heroes for ghosts....da da da....hot air for a cool breeze....da da da.... Wish you were here!
Thursday, August 18, 2005
How do I know this? By deduction, my dear friend. First, I watched Howard Dean on Face the Nation last week, where he (as usual) either (1) lambasted the President for his terrible policies (e.g., teaching creationism alongside evolution made the President "anti-science") or (2) lambasted the President's means of achieving acceptable goals (defending the country shouldn't be achieved by military force). Specifically, Dean said that we couldn't afford to use force against Iran's nuclear ambitions (allegedly an acceptable goal) because our military is too overstretched in Iraq. Then, when asked whether he approved of the use of force against Iran to stop them before they develop any nuclear weapons (a forbidden affirmative act), Dean immediately backpeddled. If he didn't, he just might agree with the President, who said that force was on the table. I guess Dean plans on repeating the diplomatic success of the Clinton administration's negotiations with North Korea.
The Dean interview just about said it all. By deduction, if we're too weak to defend ourselves against the combined front of a rag-tag group of terrorists in Iraq and the Mullahs in Iran and their armies, there is absolutely no chance that we could beat China, who along with Russia participated in joint military exercises last week. In fact, we couldn't beat either of them.
Back to Taiwan. If a Democrat gets into office, that island will be to countries what Elian was to Cuba. Elian voluntarily left a Communist hellhole to come to the (evil) United States. Like Elian, he Nationalist armies fled to Taiwan in 1949 to get away from the Maoist Commies. After Castro made a big stink about Elian's return (notably, without force to back it up), the Democrats rolled over and returned Elian (using military force) to a country so corrupt that we won't even trade with it. Like Castro, the Chicoms are making a big stink about returning Taiwan to the mainland. Although it hasn't (officially) happened yet, the Dems are sure to capitulate there too.
So there you have it. If China decides to attack Taiwan, Dean has already surrendered. According to him, we're just too overstretched in Iraq, dammit. If we weren't in this quagmire, tough-minded Democrats would, maybe...uhh.......Well that's not important anyway. Besides, Cindy Sheehan would disapprove.
Democrats are incapable of handling foreign policy. Never vote for them.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Honorable mentions: Brad/Angelina/Jennifer love triangle; Valerie Plame Affair; Bill Clinton CD.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
10. Melissa Etheridge: I Wanna Come (sic) Over
9. Michael Jackson: Beat It
8. 2 Live Crew: Me So Horny [Explicit]
7. Warrant: Cherry Pie
6. Poison: Talk Dirty to Me
5. Steely Dan: Hey Nineteen
4. Motley Crue: Girls, Girls, Girls
3. Kiss: Lick It Up
2. ZZ Top: Legs
1. Pink Floyd: Have a Cigar
You can get your copy at the Clinton Library Website. Enjoy!
Take the quiz and see how psychotically right-wing you are.
| You scored as Libertarian. Libertarians believe that you have the right to live your life as you wish, without the government interfering, as long as you donâ��t violate the rights of others. This translates into strong protections for privacy and property rights, and a weak to non-existent social safety net.|
What's Your Political Philosophy?
created with QuizFarm.com
Monday, August 15, 2005
Mr. Mattlage, who probably has a job, was upset by the traffic created by throngs of jobless protesters visiting the site of the President's ranch. Cindy Sheehan, who actually has something to protest (her son was killed in Iraq), is leading the group, most of which has no reason to protest at all (except, of course, when you're counting an overprivileged childhood, a Communist-inspired university education, or how, like, "wrong" war as valid reasons for a protest). I'm willing to bet that this was the first time many of these pampered babies had ever even heard a gunshot. Maybe when the war is over they can restart the gun control movement.
Friday, August 12, 2005
If it weren't for the willful amnesia of the mainstream press, you might hear some reporting about this same woman criticizing someone else for taking money from mobsters--especially since the charges are utterly false. But you won't hear that in this story.
Monday, August 08, 2005
The obituaries of Jennings' life bear our the theme that the press is an emotional or "spiritual" outlet, not a news source. Just read the following passage, as written by Howard Kurtz and printed in the Washington Post:
I remember hanging out in the ABC skybox at the Democratic convention in Boston last year as Jennings, in shirtsleeves, anchored a two-hour digital cable broadcast also available to America Online and cell phone users. He reveled in the spontaneity of it, without knowing whether the audience would be hundreds or hundreds of thousands, and boasted that the program would kick off with music by Jimi Hendrix.
Could you ever see Jennings "reveling" in the "spontenaity" of the Republican Convention? Of course not. But that is what he lent to liberalism--a self-righteous, snide tone when talking about conservatives, a somber tone when liberal heroes were taken down or Communists defeated, and an ecstatic tone when liberals were on parade.
With Peter Jennings passage, what must be on the mind of all liberals is whether someone will be able to show the appropriate affect when reading the news or interpreting an event as important as the Democratic National Convention. If no one steps forward with the same charisma, maybe they libs will actually start listening to Air America.
Friday, August 05, 2005
To defend himself, all that Novak has to do is say that he was "expressing himself" in an artistic manner. And now his civil rights are being violated by CNN, which is "suppressing" his right to free expression. Oh wait, that only works if you want a shit-stained picture of the Virgin Mary displayed in a public museum. Silly me for thinking otherwise.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
If you’re not familiar with Neal Boortz then this will be a great day for you. Neal is a radio talk show host in
- Tuesday (
8/2/05) Neal will be on during the third hour of Sean Hannity’s radio show (appox. ). Listen live here.
- Tuesday (
8/2/05) Neal will be on Hannity & Colmes this evening. Fox News Channel, .
- Wednesday (
8/3/05) Neal will appear on CNN’s American Morning. CNN, .
- Wednesday (
8/3/05) Neal will appear on Your World w/ Neil Cavuto. Fox News Channel, .
Near King’s Cross station, on Gray’s